Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
It is noteworthy that the maximum intersample interval of 29.8 ms was greater than 16.67 ms that is, the double of the ideal intersample interval.
On the other hand, the maximum intersample interval was 8.60 in the data obtained by hardware set 1b. > -wrap-foot> Unit: milliseconds The time lag in communicating between the presentation PC and recorder PC is also an important point for evaluating temporal performance.
Similar(58)
Table 2 shows the mean, standard deviation (SD), 0.5 percentile point, and 99.5 percentile point, as well as the minimum and maximum values of intersample intervals.
Table 3 shows the mean, SD, 0.5 percentile point, and 99.5 percentile point, as well as the minimum and maximum of the intersample intervals.
The difference between the mean intersample interval and an ideal interval was less than 0.01 ms.
Because the frame rate of the camera was 120 Hz, the ideal intersample interval was 8.33 ms.
First, the intersample interval becomes too brief at very high frequencies for the recorder PC to process camera images during recording.
Figure 2 shows the frequency distribution of intersample intervals obtained from these hardware sets.
As compared with the intersample intervals recorded by hardware set 1b, those recorded by hardware set 1a were broadly distributed.
Intersample intervals longer than 16.67 ms were observed four times among all data recorded by hardware set 1a.
Ninety-nine percent of intersample intervals fell within approximately ±0.3 ms from the ideal interval; however, several samples were lost when the data were recorded by a PC that was not designed for lab use (hardware set 1a).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com