The comparison shows good agreement (maximum discrepancy is 0.45%).
Results from Table 3 show good agreement, and the maximum discrepancy is 5.07% (Mode 3).
The present model is first validated by comparing the natural frequencies of the bending and in-plane motions of isotropic plates with available data in the literature and the agreement is found to be excellent with the maximum discrepancy being only 0.25%.
Two independent chains were run until they converged (i.e., maximum observed discrepancy was lower than 0.2), and the effective number of model parameters was at least 100 after the first 1/5 generation was omitted from topology and posterior probability inference.
McLean and von Fraunhofer stated that a marginal gap of about 100 μm does not cause any clinical problems in a study observing 1,000 dental restorations performed over more than 5 years, concluding that the clinically allowable maximum marginal discrepancy was 120 μm [ 13].
The maximum discrepancy allowed was 7%, which is two times the repeatability of the blood sample well counter measurements.
Maximum leg length discrepancy was 7 cm.
The maximum molecular weight discrepancy was set at 100 ppm.
