Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(44)
The comparison shows good agreement (maximum discrepancy is 0.45%).
The maximum discrepancy in the results reached approximately 2 ns.
The maximum discrepancy across the discontinuity is approximately 1.6 m.
The model displayed good agreement with the experimental findings with maximum discrepancy of 8%.
The model was able to predict well the experimental data with a maximum discrepancy of ±5.0%.
Results from Table 3 show good agreement, and the maximum discrepancy is 5.07% (Mode 3).
Similar(16)
The maximum discrepancies between the simulated and measured results are 0.14, 0.42 and 1.13 mV, respectively.
Maximum discrepancies between measured and predicted NO concentrations were between 5 and 7 ppm (∼50%).
The maximum discrepancies in the pore pressure response of the formulations leading to validity regions are illustrated for typical dynamic problems.
Comparison between the experimental and simulation models showed maximum discrepancies of 11.8% and 13.5% in surface temperature and peak space thermal load, respectively.
Maximum discrepancies between the true and the effective hyperpolarizabilities are calculated as a function of the orientation parameter D, and it is shown that the relative difference may not exceed 40% for usual distribution functions of the tilt angle.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com