Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(13)
The maximum discrepancies between the simulated and measured results are 0.14, 0.42 and 1.13 mV, respectively.
Maximum discrepancies between measured and predicted NO concentrations were between 5 and 7 ppm (∼50%).
The maximum discrepancies in the pore pressure response of the formulations leading to validity regions are illustrated for typical dynamic problems.
Comparison between the experimental and simulation models showed maximum discrepancies of 11.8% and 13.5% in surface temperature and peak space thermal load, respectively.
Maximum discrepancies between the true and the effective hyperpolarizabilities are calculated as a function of the orientation parameter D, and it is shown that the relative difference may not exceed 40% for usual distribution functions of the tilt angle.
For pin-by-pin radial power distributions, all codes give acceptable results, with maximum discrepancies on C/E − 1 of the order of 3 4% for very heterogeneous bundles where Pmax/Pmin reaches 4, 2. These values are within 2 standard deviations of the experimental uncertainty.
Similar(47)
The comparison shows good agreement (maximum discrepancy is 0.45%).
The maximum discrepancy in the results reached approximately 2 ns.
The maximum discrepancy across the discontinuity is approximately 1.6 m.
Results of this comparison showed a maximum discrepancy of 3·63percentt.
The model displayed good agreement with the experimental findings with maximum discrepancy of 8%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com