Sentence examples for maximum diameters obtained from inspiring English sources

In addition, good correlation (R2=0.81) between maximum diameters obtained from this method and pathology was observed (Table 2).

Table 2 shows the correlation of maximum diameters obtained with various PET- and CT-based tumour delineation methods with pathology data.

These results correspond with those of previous studies [4, 13], in which small differences in maximum tumour diameter between an adaptive threshold method and pathology were reported [13], as well as good correlation between maximum diameters obtained from a percentage threshold-based method and pathology [4].

For the first analysis, the measured maximum tumour diameters were compared with the maximum diameter obtained from pathology.

For this tumour, the maximum diameter obtained from PET-based methods was closer to that of pathology than for corresponding CT delineation, further illustrating the conceptual differences between anatomical (CT) and metabolic (PET) volumes.

Tumor size was measured as the maximum diameter obtained from magnetic resonance imaging data and tumors were classified accordingly as microadenomas (<10 mm) or macroadenomas (≥10 mm).

The larger mean and maximum drop diameters obtained for the homogenizer with one gap in comparison to those obtained with two gaps (at the same Reynolds number and material parameters of the emulsion phases), highlighted the strong relevance of the flow geometry to the emulsification process.

Thus, it represents the maximum caliper diameter obtained assuming that the cell was measured by means of a caliper.

Bland-Altman plots of the maximum tumour diameter obtained using CT- (A) and various PET-based (B-I) delineation methods versus those derived from pathology.

We compared the least square means of maximum tumor diameter obtained from these models in screen-detected and interval breast cancers within tertiles of mammographic measures, and we tested for linear trends across tertiles of mammographic measures.

In studying aetiological interactions of genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors in normal and abnormal developments of the dentition, methods of measurement have often been limited to maximum mesio-distal and bucco-lingual crown diameters, obtained with hand-held calipers.