Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Statistical regression analysis method was applied to investigate the maximum cutting force generated and which was found at an approach angle = 450, feed = 0.3 mm, depth of cut = 1 mm and noseradius = 0.8 mm.
The results of cutting experiments show that the maximum cutting force of bionic saw blade was 128.26 N, which is 15.87% lower than 152.45 N of traditional saw blade; the average cutting force of bionic saw blade was 51.56 N, which is 28.17% less than 71.78 N of traditional saw blade.
It was observed that in CD, maximum cutting force [Fig. 6(a)] and torque [Fig. 6(b)] increased significantly as the drill bit was reused.
The change in the magnitude of maximum cutting force and torque with respect to repeated drilling for CD (without any ultrasonic vibration) and RUD are presented in Fig. 6.
Similar(56)
A set of technological constraints such as maximum allowed cutting force per tooth or maximum allowed rise per tooth are considered.
Thus, quasi-static quantities (i.e., average or maximum resultant cutting force per spindle revolution) are compared instead.
The influence of cutting speed, feed rate and depth of cut is observed maximum for determination of flank wear, cutting force and surface roughness respectively.
In CD, cutting force, torque and maximum change in temperature increased continuously as the number of drilled holes increased.
So, it is concluded that at this stage, the maximum value of the fluctuation of the cutting force was larger.
The maximum shear stress at the cutting edge (cutting force divided by initial foil thickness and cutting length) was found to correlate closely with the tensile yield stress of PP.
The present paper focuses on the determination of the optimum cutting conditions leading to minimum surface roughness as well as cutting force, cutting power and maximum productivity, in the case of the turning of the Polyoxymethylene polymer POM C using cemented carbide cutting tool.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com