Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
The maximum contraction force is 11 N and the maximum contraction ratio is 24%% with an air pressure of 0.35 MPa.
Contractile response to cholinergic agonist carbachol increased in the neonatal group with increased maximum contraction compared to the other groups.
Maximum contraction evoked by KCl was also significantly increased in the neonatal group compared to the adult group.
In this research, actuators have been designed and fabricated to be used as human muscles, which have a maximum contraction stress of 0.30 MPa and a maximum contraction ratio of 25 30 %.
b Magnified view of thin McKibben muscle Fig. 3 Static characteristics of thin McKibben muscle with an air pressure of 0.35 MPa, where the maximum contraction force is 11 N and the maximum contraction ratio is 24%%.
where v ̄ is the muscle velocity normalized with respect to the maximum contraction velocity vm of the muscle.
A maximum contraction of 5.6% was observed at 5.7 MPa stress for a coiled CNT yarn having intermediate twist.
Human umbilical vein (HUV) from planned cesarean-sections (PCS) showed a 1.7-fold higher maximum contraction with potassium chloride compared to spontaneous vaginal deliveries (VDs, p=0.029).
An increased maximum contraction (Emax) induced by sarafotoxin 6c, but not 5-HT, was seen in the arterial segments from heat stress rats.
The analytical parameters such as softening temperature (°C), maximum contraction (°C), maximum dilatation temperature (°C), maximum contraction and maximum dilatation were recorded and used in the formula below to obtain the coefficient G, called the coking capacity: G = OE + OV 2 × c + d OV × c + OE × d Open image in new window.
Table 3 Free swelling index and Ruhr dilatometric results of the Shankodi-Jangwa coal sample Analytical parameters Characteristic values FSI 3.0 Softening temperature (°C) 380 ± 6.24 Maximum contraction temperature (°C) 420 ± 5.92 Maximum dilatation temperature (°C) 475 ± 5.53 Maximum contraction 19.9 ± 0.34 Maximum dilatation 9.2 ± 0.26 G value 0.96 ± 0.02.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com