Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Maximum SCRs were generally larger post rTMS.
Similar(59)
Naturally, the healthy controls were unlikely to be comparable with the cases in terms of general psychopathology although when this was considered in the multiple regression, it emerged that the effect of rTMS on the main objective outcome measure, maximum SCR, was not influenced by baseline psychopathology (although change in symptom scores was).
Four of the SCRs were in Haringey, with three rated good and one adequate.
Some 42% of the SCRs were found to be of a good standard, with the same proportion rated as adequate.
Firstly, catalysts and mechanism of different SCRs were briefly summarized.
SCRs were identified within a 7-second window after the onset of each stimulus; minima were identified within the first 1.5 seconds and maxima between.5 and 7 seconds.
No SCRs were detected in five subjects who were excluded from SCR analysis as nonresponders.
SCRs are also costly.
The two big reasons are that publishing SCRs in full leaves children less well protected and that SCRs are not fit for purpose.
It has been recognised that SCRs are not a useful aid for learning, and this is even truer now.
The explanations given for the reduction in the number of SCRs are, firstly, that local agencies are now reluctant to have SCRs undertaken because they do not want public exposure of their failings through the publication of unedited full reports and, secondly, that they do not want to incur the cost of doing SCRs.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com