Exact(4)
For B1 in the time span 2010 2100 this makes additional harvests of 40 tC/ha when maximising increment compared to maximising standing carbon.
A management which is maximising standing biomass will raise the stem wood carbon stocks from 30 tC/ha to 50 tC/ha until 2100.
For EU27 in the time span 2010 2100 this makes in total 10 200 million tC stem wood harvests in the scenario maximising standing biomass but 16 600 million tC when maximising increments.
The increments until 2040 are close together but around 2100 the increments when maximising standing biomass are approximately 50%% lower than those when maximising increments.
Similar(4)
maximise standing volume and keep current species.
During the time span 2010 2100 the forests of EU27 will absorb additional 1750 million tC if they are managed to maximise increments compared if they are managed to maximise standing biomass.
Here the picture is contrary to the standing stem carbon (Figure 1) by having high amounts of harvest when maximising increment and low harvest amounts when maximising the standing stem carbon.
Both management targets (maximise increment – maximise standing biomass) are competing against each other.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com