Sentence examples for maximal relative errors from inspiring English sources
Compared with the simulation results of CPLEX software, the maximal relative errors of simulation is less than 2%.
Figure 6 shows average fluorescence intensities and their maximal relative errors (A) and the cumulative distribution of maximal relative errors (B) For nearly 90% of the gene transcripts (n = 2,269), maximal relative errors of ORF-related signals were <60%.
In contrast, the same percentile of maximal relative errors recorded from E. coli probes represented >100% of average signal intensities.
The 90th percentile of maximal relative errors from S. aureus probes represented <25% of average signal intensities.
Furthermore, the 50th percentile on E. coli probes was superior to the 90th percentile of maximal relative errors on S. aureus probes.
Maximal relative errors [ average-min)/average] of fluorescent probe signal intensities were more widely scattered on E. coli (Fig. 5B) compared to S. aureus (Fig. 5A) capture elements, thus reflecting the instability of poorly specific interactions with S. aureus targets and E. coli probes.
Samadianfard claims that his approximation is very accurate with the maximal relative error of no more than 0.08152%.
Compared to the existing approximate adders, our adder significantly reduces the maximal relative error and ensures correct sign calculation with comparable area, delay, and power consumption.
Maximal relative error of the explicit approximation to the Colebrook equation for flow friction presented in the discussed paper by Saeed Samadianfard [J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 92 93 (2012) 48 55; doi. 10.1016/j.petrol.2012.06.005] is investigated.
The numerical results obtained display a very good agreement towards the given data with a maximal relative error of about 5% for the pressure and less than 1% for the temperature and the mass flow rate.
Figure 16 and Figure 17 depict the evolution of the 'maximal relative error at the outputs', which is defined as the maximal relative error at all outputs.
