Sentence examples for maximal n for from inspiring English sources

And so we set out to determine the maximal n for a Balsams sports day.

After three weeks of tail suspension, the bone strength at the tibia in the unloaded group (HS) was 28.5% weaker (measured by maximal load and load at the yield point) than that of the bones from the control rats (44.7 N versus 62.3 N for maximal load and 36.4 N versus 51.3 N for load at the yield point, P < 0.001).

The extent of the aggregation is maximal for N-benzoyl- 2R,3S -phenylisoseryloxyadamantane (5) aN-benzoyl- 2R,3S -phenylisoseryloxyadamantanecations. N-benzoyl- 2R,3S -phenylisoseryloxyadamantane

Mechanical tests showed that the PHBHHx nerve conduits had proper mechanical properties including maximal loads of 3.1 N and 1.3 N for the conduits with non-uniform wall porosity and with uniform wall porosity, respectively, and maximal stresses of 2.3 MPa and 0.94 MPa for the conduits with non-uniform wall porosity and with uniform wall porosity, respectively.

Then, finally we will find a maximal m-open set A = B n for some n ∈ N Open image in new window.

Note that the naive bound of O(n) for out can be improved to O(n) by writing down only the differences between subsequent maximal cliques.

Put c n = b n a n for n ≥ 1, 1 < r < 2. Denote Y n = − c n I ( X n < − c n ) + X n I ( | X n | ≤ c n ) + c n I ( X n > c n ), n ≥ 1, and suppose that { a n b n ( Y n − E Y n ), n ≥ 1 } satisfies the maximal moment inequality with exponent 2. Assume that the following two conditions hold: E | X | r < ∞, (3.12).

For aligning k sequences with maximal length n, we start by computing pairwise alignments between all pairs of the input sequences.

Third, we consider the Chow type maximal inequality for N-demimartingales.

By using Theorem 2.3, Hadjikyriakou [22] got the following maximal inequality for N-demimartingales.

But we find that the Chow type maximal inequality for N-demimartingales, i.e., Theorem 2.3, is not true.