Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
In volunteers, the mean height of the saccule was 1.40 ± 0.10 mm (mean ± SD) and the maximal height was 1.6 mm, with a range from 1.10 to 1.60 mm (Fig. 5); the mean normal width of the saccule was 1.20 ± 0.10 mm and the maximal width was 1.40 mm.
Similar(59)
The best trial in terms of maximal jump height was taken for further data analysis.
Both T1(C) and T1ρ(H) relaxation data were fit using Origin software (OriginLab, Northampton, MA); for each carbon peak, the relaxation curve obtained using maximal peak height was fit by a single-exponential function.
Height was measured at maximal inspiration using a set square and a standard tape measure, and weight using a portable electronic scale (Health-O-Meter Professional Scale; Model HAP300-01; Boca Raton, FL, USA).
The relationship between reductions in maximal triplet torque and one-leg (right) jump height was significant (r = 0.83, P = 0.04) (Fig. 4).
Participants were each given five attempts and the baseline height was subtracted from the highest peg achieved to calculate maximal vertical jump height.
After merging the two cohorts, the inverse correlation with height was confirmed for 6/8 CGs of the P2 promoter and was maximal for CG-137 methylation (P = 4 × 10−7), so that CG-137 methylation accounted for 13% of height variability.
The medians for maximal length and height were 265 mm (73 – 400) and 90 mm (12 – 200) in the sand colic cases and 83 mm (7 – 156) and 9 mm (2 – 86) in the controls.
Besides height, also sitting height was measured.
In addition, the magnetic field dependence of the maximal deviation of Schottky barrier height is consistent with the calculated values of the superconducting gap versus magnetic field.
The MIT-1003 dataset contains 1,003 natural images of varying dimensions (the maximal dimension of the width and height is 1,024 pixels), along with human fixation data from 15 subjects.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com