Sentence examples for maximal fold change from inspiring English sources

In Figure 1B, we plotted the number of genes by maximal fold change in both the up and down set.

Genes for which the maximal fold change across the conditions was below 2 were filtered, leaving 1,536 genes (front nodes).

A different picture of the variability in gene expression across tissues emerges when we look at the maximal fold change between mice (Table 1D).

The top five proteins which exhibited the maximal fold change between CCA and BBTD consisted of FAM19A5, MAGED4B, KIAA0321, RBAK, and UPF3B.

S100A12 was significantly (P < 0.01) up-regulated 4 24 h after LPS stimulation with a maximal fold change of 10.6 at 24 h.

Briefly this involved calculating the MFC (maximal fold change), i.e. the ratio of the maximum and minimum expression values for all microarrays performed in the experiment, and the CV, i.e. the coefficient of variation.

We first removed hypothetical and not-significantly-changed (P≥0.05) genes if the P-value is available; then selected a total of 200 genes with maximal fold changes (100 positive, and 100 negative each).

In adipose, 2.6% of all genes exhibit maximal fold changes greater than 2, whereas 0.4-0.6 0.4-0.6 genes show fold changes this large in the other three tissues.

There are many genes with large maximal fold changes between mice but, particularly in adipose tissue, these same genes also have large within-mouse variance, which reduces their statistical significance.

As shown in Figure 5A, the maximal fold changes of MnP1 and MnP2 were relatively small, in that the peak of MnP1 expression was at 15 weeks with a 1.5-fold increase (relative to the expression level at 3 weeks), while MnP2 expression peaked later at 18 weeks with a larger (2.7-fold) increase.

The number of genes with large maximal fold-change between mice (D).