Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Data consisted of MIP, exertional dyspnea ratings, and maximal exercise measures.
Similar(59)
The baseline session involved participation on the Eriksen flankers task followed by a graded maximal exercise test to measure cardiovascular fitness.
Regarding the second main comparison, the resistance training/aerobic group vs. the active control group for change in maximal exercise capacity as measured in metabolic equivalents (METS), 48 subjects per group are required to demonstrate a 0.66 SD difference between groups at the end of the 6-month intervention period and also potentially at 12-month follow-up [ 38, 39].
However, little is known with regard to sex differences at rest and following maximal exercise in several established measures of autonomic function.
Outcomes included CRF from total duration on a maximal exercise treadmill test and measured BMI.
We performed a maximal exercise test (VO2max) and measured endothelial function using venous occlusion plethysmography and intra-arterial infusion of acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside and NG-monomethyl-l-arginine.
40 The 6 min walking test measures walking distance as a rough measure of maximal exercise capacity and was performed according to the American Thoracic Society.
The improvement of physical function was assessed with three performance-based tests at baseline and subsequently every 6 months: The 6 min walking test measures walking distance as a rough measure of maximal exercise capacity and was performed according to the American Thoracic Society.
The purpose of the study was to determine if inspiratory muscle training (IMT) would result in increased inspiratory muscle strength, reduced perception of exertional dyspnea, and improved measures of maximal exercise effort in an athlete with exercise-induced paradoxical vocal fold motion (PVFM).
The primary outcome measures are maximal exercise capacity and HRQoL.
To detect a true difference in the primary outcome measures of maximal exercise capacity and HRQoL, a total of 36 subjects (18 per group) will be required.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com