Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(16)
For those herds that remain locally, we found significant differences between group ranches on two key herding parameters: maximal distance to water and herding radius.
The merging operator that uses \(D_{\mymax}\) is known as minimax and outputs the judgment set that minimizes the maximal distance to the individual bases (Brams et al. 2007b).
There were consistent differences between rich and poor/middle class herders in maximal distance to water and herding radius (see Tables 4 and 5 and Figures 15 and 16).
Wealthy families travel shorter distances to reach water, meaning they spend less time trekking to water and more time grazing Figure 16 Quadratic fit of herding radius as a function of maximal distance to water by wealth rank.
Therefore, the theoretical maximal distance between labels attached to subunits one and two, or to subunits three and four (for clarification, see also the three-dimensional structure of avidin (Figure 1A), would be ∼50 Å, although the structural features of avidin limit the maximal distance to around (30±10) Å in reality.
Furthermore, in both cases around half the pairs showed a maximal distance to the ATG of 350 bp (not shown).
Similar(44)
Poor herders travelled longer maximal distances to water (864 meters) and used a larger area (400 meters) to complete their herding path.
It is worth noticing that in Equation 5 all pairs of maps were considered with maximal distance equal to 3. Including more maps lowers the effect of noise.
This drop was mainly observed for the maximal distance, leading to a residue of 3% of the original solution space.
We consider the constrained minimax problem to find a circle which minimizes the maximal weighted distance to a set of points passing through two given points.
F. tularensis subsp. tularensis strain Schu (CAPM 5600) showed a highly unrelated banding pattern with maximal pairwise distance to all other isolates.
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com