Sentence examples for maximal current in from inspiring English sources

A further increase in humidity to 87% not only increases maximal current in components 1 and 2, but also leads to intensity shift from component 1 to component 2 in the abundance maps (cf. Figure 9e,i and Figure 9f,j pairwise), i.e., decreasing the height of potential barrier of electron/hole injection from the tip into the nanocomposite.

This was quantified by bi-exponential fitting of the decline of net current at each voltage; data from individual cells at each time-point were normalised to maximal current in ACh, and then pooled.

The current amplitude was normalized to the maximal current obtained in each patch, and the control curve is a mean of 7 patches (Fig. 4b).

Electrode 9, overlaying left BA 6, was the same electrode at which we observed the maximal current increase in TMS-evoked responses after rTMS conditioning.

The same pattern was present in recordings from GFP-D2 slices, however the maximal current amplitude produced in cells from GFP-D2 slices was significantly smaller than seen in WT (Fig. 2F).

Fig. 5B shows the mean normalized instantaneous I V relation for WT IhERG during AP repolarization, with maximal current relatively late in repolarization (at − 30.7 ± 2.1 mV; n = 7 cells).

The magnitude of the currents suggests that their activation is controlled as even the highest modified currents measured were smaller than the average observed in uninfected cells submitted to a 25% reduction in osmolarity and on average only 10% of the maximal currents reported in this study were recorded in initial traces in mature infected liver cells.

Between-group comparisons of the effect of CPA and isradipine on the magnitude of maximal current produced by quinpirole in wild type neurons are now included in the revised manuscript.

Source data for time to 50% maximal current can be found in Supplementary Table S2. Figure 3: Voltage Dependence of NaV1.1 Conductance and Fast Inactivation.

The difference in maximal current values obtained with DSA and graphite was not linked to the biofilm coverage ratios, which were of the same order of magnitude in the range of 62 78%.

On the contrary, the difference in maximal current values matched the ratio of the average surface roughness of the materials, 5.6 μm and 3.2 μm for graphite and DSA, respectively.