Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Maxima (positive correlation) and minima (negative or anti-correlation) can be clearly distinguished, with a strong anti-correlation for genes that lie opposite of each other on the chromosome (a gene distance of around 650).
Similar(59)
Accounting for the potential false absences in the dataset allows the possibility that the presences of hybrids and P. eos were either positively or negatively correlated (maximum negative correlation: odds ratio = 0, p<0.001; maximum positive correlation: odds ratio = infinite, p<0.001).
Shubina and Lee (2004) showed that the maximum positive correlation of (5) is effected by concentrating all its mass on the (NE-SW) quadrants: {(x,y):(x - x0)(y - y0) ≥ 0}, and for the negative, on the (NW-SE) quadrants: {(x,y):(x - x0)(y - y0) ≤ 0}, for some real numbers x0 and y0.
The correlation plots reveal a wide range of correlation coefficients among all of the measured metabolites, ranging from 1.0 (maximum positive correlation) to −1.0 (maximum anticorrelation) and 0 indicating no correlation.
There was also no significant correlation between the presences of hybrids and P. neogaeus, regardless of how the false absences are accounted for (maximum negative correlation: odds ratio = 0.63, p = 0.3104; maximum positive correlation: odds ratio = 2.01, p = 0.0999).
There was a negative correlation between the presences of P. eos and P. neogaeus (odds ratio = 0.20, p = 0.0238), and accounting for false absences allows only the possibility of a negative correlation (maximum negative correlation: odds ratio = 0, p<0.001; maximum positive correlation: odds ratio = infinite, p = 0.5728).
For the value of bicor from −1 to 1, −1 represents the maximum negative correlation and 1 represents the maximum positive correlation.
Note −1 ≤ r ≤ 1, thus, r = 0 corresponds to no interaction, r = −1 is the maximum negative correlation, and r = 1 is the maximum positive correlation.
The maximum positive correlation (0.84) was observed between grain volume and horizontal deviation from ellipse (HDFE), followed by r = 0.81 between horizontal area and composite 1 (Comp1).
The second LV showed a task main effect (singular value = 152.44, P < 0.016, task demands LV, Fig. 6, see Table 2 for a list of local maxima), with positive correlations for temporal sequencing tasks and negative for comparison tasks.
It is thus flexible enough to accommodate nearly the maximum positive (negative) correlation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com