Sentence examples for max quality coverage from inspiring English sources

On the other hand we have a huge drop of about 20% in max quality coverage.

The ML schemes show a wider spreading between the min and max quality coverage.

As exemplary setting, the med quality category of the "UEP 0.6/0.8 @ 6 dB" scheme shows a 2% gain in comparison to the max quality coverage of the "SingleLayerFEC_0.6_max" curve.

This is due to the loss in max quality coverage due to the lower protection for the nonreferenced pictures and an increase in min quality coverage due to the higher protection for audio and the referenced pictures.

With the assumption that the loss of nonreferenced p-pictures is tolerable (cf. Section 5), we can compare the med quality coverage of the ML scheme with the max quality coverage of the SL scheme.

The lower one of the connected points denotes the coverage of users receiving the max quality, whereas the coverage of the med quality is depicted by the middle point.

Whereas all selected ML schemes show a lower coverage for the max quality category, a gain for the med and the min quality category coverage can be observed.

Therefore all the ML transmission schemes loose coverage in the max quality compared to the SL transmission.

For SL transmission the coverage of the med and max quality has almost the same value due to the selection of quality layers in Tables 8, 9, and 10 and the selection of the quality categories depicted in Table 4.

Due to the less robust enhancement layer, the max quality category of the ML schemes shows a weaker coverage.

As can be observed in Figure 19, the ML schemes for the Wineyard sequence can increase the coverage for the min quality category but also show a high loss for the max quality.