Scanning was done in the 3T Siemens Trio Magnetom MRI with the Total Imaging Matrix technology scanner at the Functional Neuroimaging Unit of the CRIUGM.
High-resolution T1 anatomical images were acquired from each subject on a 1.5 T Philips Eclipse scanner (matrix size 256×212×256, voxel size 0.94×1.30×0.94 mm, TE 4.47 ms, TR 15 ms, flip angle 35°, field of view 240×240 mm).
Each subject participated in a one-hour behavioral task training session followed by high-resolution T1 structural brain imaging on a 1.5 T Philips Eclipse scanner (matrix size 256×212×256, voxel size 0.94×1.30×0.94 mm, TE 4.47 ms, TR 15 ms, flip angle 35°, field of view 240×240 mm).
We developed a prototype of an ultrasound (US) bone matrix densitometer, the BEAM scanner, in the context of a European Space Agency research program.
These are explained by the replacement of the bed-mounted posterior array coil by a central matrix array at the scanner iso-center.
To search for transcription factor binding sites, MotifScanner was used with the following settings: motif Position Weight Matrix (PWM) scoring, Motif Scanner, P2: TRANSFAC 7.0, Priorrior 0.1, P4: background model (mouse DBTSS promoters [3]), stand integer 1.
The result is the position and orientation matrix for the laser line scanner beam and its movement on the trajectory in relation to a component surface.
A majority of patients included in the University College London FTLD cohort have had at least one T1-weighted magnetic resonance brain volume acquired on either a 1.5T GE Signa scanner (General Electric) (256 × 256 matrix; 1.5 cm slice thickness) or a 3.0T Siemens Trio scanner (Siemens) (256 × 256 matrix; 1.1 cm slice thickness).
A computer, depending on the text to be composed, directs the position of the reading device's scanner towards that part of the matrix plate that bears the matrix of the letter selected, and simultaneously directs the position of the output device's scanner toward that part of the screen that corresponds to the position of this letter in the line being composed.
The new generation of code can handle more information because it is arranged in a dot-matrix style that communicates with a scanner both horizontally and vertically — as opposed to the one-dimensional, linear manner of regular bar codes.
The inclusion of small lesions in TLF reduced accuracy, which is largely associated with the resolution of both the scanner and the reconstructed image matrix.
