Ai Feedback
Exact(4)
The intra-day and inter-day precision and accuracy were 0.66 2.66% and 95.05 99.17% in human plasma matrix while in RLMs matrix, ranged from 0.97 to 3.08% and 95.8 to 100.09%, respectively.
The relatedness among the 201 genotypes estimated from the allele-similarity kinship matrix ranged from 0.11 to 1.00 with a mean of 0.37.
The aligned nrDNA (ITS4-ITS5) matrangednged from 1,079 to 1,087 bp with a consensus length of 1,100 bp that contained 32 polymorphic sites and 11 indels (Additional file 3: Table S3).
The largest divergence was observed between B. forskalii and B. umbilicatus populations (Fst = 0.903), whereas those of B. truncatus and B. tropicus are the most closely related (Fst = 0.206), as expected since these two species are part of the same group.> The average within species diversity using the combined data matrix ranged from 0.005 to 0.040 (Table 3).
Similar(56)
The Ge incorporation level inside the 4H-SiC matrix, ranging from a few 1017 to a few 1018 at.
In the past works, we tried indeed different weight ratios between the filler amount and the polymeric matrix, ranging from 1 1 to 5.5:1 (filler: PDMS).
Chondrocytes exist at low oxygen tension within the cartilage matrix, ranging from 10% at the surface to less than 1% in the deep zones.
A set of weights on the pedigree relationship matrix (ranging from 0.05 to 0.40) was used to build the combined relationship matrix in the single-step blending method and the GBLUP method with a polygenetic effect.
The observed diffusivities for permanganate into the rock matrices ranged from 5.3 × 10− 13 to 1.3 × 10− 10−cm2/s.
The limit of quantification (LOQs) and limit of detection (LODs) of the 70 pesticides for the selected matrices ranged from 0.3 to 7.9 μg kg−1 and from 0.1 to 2.4 μg kg−1 respectively.
Ratio of co-doping in the crystalline matrices ranged from no incorporation (for Hf, Zn, and Zr) up to 200 ppm for Sr and 10 20 ppm for Ca. The effect of the aliovalent co-doping on the mechanical properties of the crystals and in particular on their mechanical strength, hardness and toughness has been measured.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com