Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Table 5 Random consistency index values in a pair-wise comparison matrix Number of items being compared (n) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 RI 0 0 0.52 0.9 1.12 1.24 1.32 1.41 Source: Adopted from Saaty and Vargas ([1991]).
where s l, Φ ¯ sl = σ ¯ sl 2 I m ¯ l, m l ( m l ≤ u l < b l ) and F l are the source vector, source covariance matrix, number of data stream, and precoder of the l th user, respectively; n k, Φ n k = β ¯ k I b ¯ k, and G k are the noise vector, noise covariance matrix, and decoder of the k th cell site; and H kl is the uplink channel matrix from the l th user to the k th cell site.
The molecular distance matrix (number of pairwise differences) between NAT2 haplotypes was included in AMOVA and FST computations.
Weighted interaction matrix (number of visits) for the Piedmont site.
Weighted interaction matrix (number of visits) for the Jarillal site.
A series of T2*-weighted images for each slice was acquired at different echo times using a multigradient-echo sequence with an echo spacing interval of 4.2 ms (repetition time TR=2,000 ms; first echo time TE=7.6 ms; 64 × 32 data acquisition image matrix; number of averages=2; field of view=35 × 35 mm; slice thickness=1 mm; number of slices=6).
Similar(53)
The penetrance matrices, number of SNPs, allele frequency and sample size for these comparisons were identical to those evaluated by Culverhouse [ 2].
The analyses treated the transition-transversion matrices, number of invariant sites, and gamma shape parameters as unlinked or independent for each codon site.
The four two-locus models and simulation parameters (penetrance matrices, number of SNPs, allele frequency and sample size) employed in the original MDR power evaluation paper by Ritchie et al. [ 16] were used for comparison against the KWII.
The matrix V is a cell matrix: the number of elements in each row is distinct.
Due to the correlation structure in the sensitivity matrix, the number of components from the PCA model is fewer than the number of parameters.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com