Sentence examples for matrices were compared from inspiring English sources

λ's calculated from the aerial and ground derived matrices were compared using randomization tests.

The ordination patterns obtained with Principal Coordinate Analysis for the different matrices were compared using Procrustes analyses.

The properties of the connectivity matrices were compared to the matrices obtained using the mean cortical thickness for the same cortical parcellations.

Because OPN is involved in ECM/integrin signaling, and may participate in proliferative control, the proliferation profiles of control and allylamine vSMCs seeded on different matrices were compared.

Water uptake during and after immersion for up to 28 days in deionised water at 40 °C, and the effects of such conditioning on the interlaminar shear and flexural performance of the composites with isophthalic polyester, vinyl ester and urethane acrylate matrices were compared to those of equivalent composites impregnated with three grades of epoxy resin.

These distance matrices were compared using a Mantel t-test.

Then, the obtained natural frequencies by these matrices are compared with the available literature.

In this section, the performance of the proposed and the existing DCT matrices are compared in terms of hardware cost and computing time.

Mantel's test randomly reorders the rows and columns of one of the two correlation matrices being compared and recalculates the matrix correlation between the two matrices [44].

How can the matrices be compared when the matrix type used for comparison is not the same?

To evaluate this similarity, the precision between LIT and AMBCA (symmetrized) matrices are compared against 1000 random matrices created by shuffling the brain region names in the same way for rows and columns.