Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
This makes SPEEK a good potential choice over alternative membrane matrices reported in the literature and a promising platform for the establishment of membrane components.
The motifs of the listed TFs are significantly enriched with p < 0.01 in putative enhancer regions compared to random sequences drawn from PrL set, chr19 and promoter 5 kb regions using the Clover algorithm [ 27] with TF binding matrices reported in PSSM column Raw scores from Clover algorithm are reported.
This motif has a MEME score of E = 1.4 × 10-12 and the TOMTOM tool indicated its high similarity to two DR4-type LXR consensus matrices reported in the Transfac database (M00766 with E = 4.95 × 10-10 and M00647 with E = 1.60 × 10-8).
Similar(56)
The results were analysed, making the confusion matrix reported in Table 7.
The resulting (24 × 2 + 8 × 1) = 56 measuring conditions are listed in the matrix reported in Table 1.
The highest concentration of Mn in the ZnO matrix reported in ref. [29] is as low as 1.3%.
The top surface of the nanowalls is relatively flat, different from the faceted GaN matrix reported in Ref. [13].
The upper temperature limit for patterning increased with decreasing solute diffusivity in the Cu matrix, reported in the absence of irradiation.
Compared to AgNP transport in undisturbed sandstone matrix reported in the literature, their mobility in partially fissured sandstone is enhanced probably due to larger void spaces and higher hydraulic conductivity.
For p63 we used the matrix reported in [53], while for p53 we employed the one found in Jaspar database [54].
Looking at the factor-loading matrix reported in Table 4 (the loadings are the correlation coefficients between original variables and components) it is evident that the first factor (component) corresponds to a common "size" component [35] in which all the variables enter with a positive correlation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com