Both matrixes are comparable in terms of IF-circulating levels and could be used independently.
It would be logical to specify the same P-value for both PWMs, because it ensures that the sets of words independently recognized by each matrix are comparable in size.
The estimates of trait heritability when using the genomic relationship matrix was comparable but slightly higher than the equivalent model using the pedigree relationships (~ 0.6 vs ~ 0.5).
From the point of view of the mechanism, the release profile from the complex containing matrix was comparable to that observed in the USP Apparatus 2 experiments (n = 0.7, s.d. 0.007, R 0.998).
Two matrices are called comparable if either they are equivalent (that is, they sum the same set of sequences), or one method is stronger than the other (that is, it has the larger convergence domain).
Although the values of induced stress in both types of fibres are comparable in matrixes with 0.20 and 0.25 W/B ratios, a significant improvement in the maximum fibre stress was achieved for all fibres in matrix with 0.15 W/B ratio.
The mechanical properties of biocomposites had enhanced values compared to the original copolymer matrices and were comparable to those of cancellous bone.
Final category RIs on CLASS-Bio (Pearson correlation matrix range = 5.61 10.0; polychoric correlation matrix range = 7.09 10.0; Table 3) are comparable to those on CLASS-Phys (range = 5.57 8.25; Adams e t al., 2006) and CLASS-Chem (range = 6.01 9.68; Barbera et al., 2008).
The heritability of both traits was estimated using pedigree and genomic relationship matrices, and was comparable at around 0.5 and 0.6 respectively.
Figure 3 and Table 1 clearly indicate that the most probable distances calculated for each sample matrix (micelles, proteoliposomes, and lipodisq nanoparticles) are comparable and that the structure of the TMD of KCNE1 is comparable in all three different types of model membranes.
