Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
All predicted that assortative mating will increase genetic variation as a result of the build up of genetic covariations among loci [ 25, 27- 29].
Similar(59)
"greater exposure to potential mates will increase the frequency of offers and therefore the likelihood of marriage".
This model assumes that the per capita male mating success will increase with lek size [ 8, 9].
This means that if hybrid and/or transgenic genotypes were the only genotypes able to produce juveniles that may mature as parr, the increase in sneakers' mating success will increase their fitness in relation to the wild genotype.
Attractiveness is judged by means of adaptive psychological mechanisms that have evolved to identify prospective mates who will increase reproductive success above the level expected in random mating (Buss & Schmitt, 1993).
Unmodeled assortative mating will consequently increase the correlation of DZ twin pairs, while the MZ twin correlation remains unaffected.
This preference suggests that mating with such males will increase offspring survival.
The costs of tadpole transport for the carriers, such as conspicuousness to predators (Crump 1995), energetic effort (Simon 1983), or lost mating opportunities (Townsend 1986) will increase with the time spent distributing tadpoles.
Most previous theoretical models do not support the idea that mating with heterozygous males will increase female fitness, or contribute to maintaining genetic variation in male traits or female preferences (the so-called 'lek paradox') (reviewed in [ 10]).
Therefore, multiple mating may depend upon the genetic similarity of potential mates and whether polyandry will increase the diversity of their litters.
Any ecological factor that contributes to the association between success in mate grasping and male's fitness will increase the likelihood that the mechanics of mating becomes the main natural selection mechanism responsible for SSD.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com