Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(11)
Darwin explicitly proposed that mating preferences were aesthetic preferences (Cronin 1991; Prum 2012).
Mating preferences were quantified in terms of time spent courting each potential partner.
Furthermore, the maximally biased mating preferences were opposite in direction between the ci and Actb-SLa GFP mActb-SLa GFP
Indeed, extremely strong mating preferences were detected in a choice between the ci and SLa-transgenic (Actb-SLa GFP) medActb-SLa GFP
In our model, female mating preferences were determined by differences in the peak absorbance of the 3 opsin proteins.
While males were highly active and showed a clear behavioral preference for large partners during the mate-choice trials, female activity was lower and mating preferences were equivocal.
Similar(49)
In mate choice experiments, both sexes preferred large mates irrespective of own body size suggesting mating preferences are not size-assortative.
Dr DeBruine and Dr Brooks admit as much, and agree the dispute will not be settled until the factors that shape mating preferences are tested directly.Another recent study by Dr DeBruine and others has tried to do just that.
Mating preferences are an important aspect of the pairing process.
One limitation of our approach to date is that each female heard only one type of call, whereas mating preferences are a consequence of comparisons among calls.
According to past research MHC based mating preferences are primarily driven by inbreeding avoidance, heterozygote advantage and frequency dependent selection (for a review see [20]).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com