Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Some surgeons prefer exclusive use of autogenous materials for augmentation.
Similar(59)
Despite the availability of various graft materials for repair augmentation, there has yet to be a biomechanical study using fiber-aligned scaffolds in vivo.
One of the intents of tissue engineering is to fabricate biological materials for the augmentation or replacement of impaired, damaged, or diseased human tissue.
For the establishment of dentin as augmentation material for jaw augmentation procedures, a prospective, clinical trial is now necessary.
Autologous bone is the standard material used for augmentations in oral-maxillofacial surgery.
This study was performed to provide an objective assessment of the coronoid process as a candidate material for paranasal augmentation.
As there is no single ideal material for dorsal augmentation in rhinoplasty, there has been a continuing need for the development of improved materials.
Since the study involved CE-marked devicalciumlcium phosphates) being used for their intended purpose (use as carrier material for bone augmentation in sinus floor elevation procedures) and the harvested material can be regarded as surgical waste, no specific regulatory approval from a medical ethical committee was required.
This biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) appeared to be a suitable graft material for vertical augmentation of the posterior maxilla by means of an MSFE procedure and dental implants placement in a study with a healing time of 6 months [16, 27, 34].The process of bone substitution may not be completed after 6 months of follow-up [27, 35].
The aim of each of these is to achieve maximum results with the least material and injury, for augmentation and wrinkle reduction with a natural-looking result.
Furthermore, the available scientific evidence neither supports nor refutes the superiority of AB over other graft materials for maxillary sinus augmentation with regard to implant survival or complications at the recipient site [7].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com