Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
As described in the Supplementary Material, we considered the various different types of binding sites as a single united binding region important for protein function and we also considered each binding site type separately.
Similar(59)
The AUC was obtained applying the following procedure (see also Supplementary Material): we consider the set of all distances between nucleosome predictions and nucleosomes in the map <73 bp, we obtain a cumulative error curve.
As neutral evolutionary rates at 4-fold sites are similar among the different datasets (supplementary table S6, Supplementary Material online), we considered the concatenation of all 4-fold sites (synonymous sites) as the neutral reference for all coding regions analyzed.
Although we detected no canonical ER protein chaperones (e.g. hsp-3 and hsp-4) as induced during L4 lethargus or other cuticular synthesis periods (supplementary material Table S1), we considered the possibility that the APPG proteins are functioning as non-canonical chaperones for proteins being generated for the worm's exoskeleton.
Since lipid (Fig. 1a c) and polypeptide profiles did not change at a detergent/protein ratio of 12 1 (supplementary material Fig. S1B), we considered the ratio 8 1 for further experiments.
We considered the material to have been accepted by the animal body.
The stories accounted for so many aspects, as well as recurring themes, that we considered the material to be saturated.
For the execution of this work, we considered the following materials: natural leather, thermoplastic rubber (TR), polyurethane (PU) and a polyurethane non structural adhesive solvent based.
The materials in here on Iraq are the materials we consider relevant to the report.
To take the initial defects in the material into account, we consider the randomly distributed limit stress in the oxide layer.
So the materials in here on Saudi Arabia are the materials we consider relevant to our report.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com