Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
The packing material was stable after 50 h of operation at 185 °C.
In the reported case, tissues were coopted adequately without tension, the material was stable, and the presence of osteoblasts was likely inhibited by a lack of nutrition.
From the characterizations it was found that, the material was stable, biocompatible under tough conditions and the material had a simple foam structure (porous) except for which the boundaries that are shared by the pores are rigid providing the material with a good mechanical strength.
The results from the long-term stability tests showed the material was stable whether stored at room temperature or under refrigeration.
Most cases treated with the technique recommended in the literature (ie, tunneling), 17 in which the material is injected subcutaneously, showed formation of connective tissue septa within PMMA spheres and minimal inflammatory infiltrate, indicating that the material was stable at the injection site.
Similar(55)
The material is stable when stored at ambient temperatures.
The mNiO, which is a new pH-responsive material is stable at physiological pH 7.4.
The material is stable from room temperature up to 600 ¡C.
The thermal properties of this blend material were stable up to 250 °C.
This indicates that the crystallographic form of the SO42− ZrO4 material is stable under the carburization conditions employed.
In the leaching test, vigorous agitation is adopted to ensure that the material is stable under any circumstances occurring in the industrial process.
Related(20)
material was strong
material was durable
material was unchanged
material was consistent
substances was stable
feeds was stable
material showed stable
material was electric
material had stable
material remained stable
material was unaffected
material was secret
material was secondary
material was sliced
material was irrelevant
material was brilliant
material presented stable
material was extraordinary
material was 8-in
material was Cu2 pzdc 2 pyz
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com