Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Fig. 9 FOD material recognition results.
Similar(59)
The results of the testing phase are provided in Table 4. Comparison of recognition results obtained on data for 1 20 July (learning material) and 21 31 July (testing material) shows that the recognition quality is about the same.
However, past research results remain inadequate to meet the demands of FOD material recognition.
The results show that the proposed approach can improve the accuracy of material recognition by 39.6% over the state-of-the-art method.
(b) Recognition results.
AlexNet has the best metallic material recognition.
The general material recognition dataset is not applicable to FOD material recognition.
The recognition results were utilized as the switching signals.
These are more suitable for studies on object recognition rather than material recognition.
Material recognition is a fundamental problem in computer vision.
However, these datasets are inappropriate for FOD material recognition tasks.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com