To evaluate the efficacy of different intraocular lens (IOL) materials and optic edge designs in preventing posterior capsular opacification (PCO).
To characterize the morphology, size, and change in size of the contact zone of piggyback intraocular lenses (IOLs) of different materials and optic designs.
A combined design of an aluminum (Al -nitride silicon (SiN) bi-mAl -nitrideooled optic readout (UOR) infrared (IR) focal plane array (FPA) with 320 × 240 pixelsilicond on microelectronic technology, iSiNresented.
It consists of the following business units, such as cobalt specialty materials, electro-optic materials, and thin film products.
It operates through the following business domains: Offices, Production Printing, Performance Materials Business, Optics and Sensing Business, Sensing, Healthcare Business, Industrial Inkjet Business and Planetarium Business.
To determine whether cell adhesion on an intraocular lens (IOL) in Japanese patients is affected by the optic material.
To examine the influence of optic material (silicone and hydrophobic acrylic) and haptic design (one-piece and three-piece open loop) of sharp optic edge intraocular lenses (IOL) on anterior capsule opacification (ACO) and capsulorrhexis contraction.
To examine the influence of optic material on posterior capsule opacification (PCO) by comparing PCO and visual functions between eyes with an acrylic intraocular lens (IOLs) and those with a silicone IOL of the same optic design and with the same haptics.
As opposed to standard in-the-bag placement, its effectiveness is completely independent of optic material and optic edge design.
Thus, the choice of optic material can be solely driven by achieving optimum biocompatibility, leading to minimum cell and bacteria adhesion.
The optic material then catalyses the myofibroblastic transdifferentiation of the anterior LECs on the back side of the anterior capsule, with consecutive capsule contraction and collagen deposition [ 8 ].
