Sentence examples for material entities of from inspiring English sources

Contrary to metric proximity, no spatial gap separates the material entities of a cluster (table 3).

Since the material entities of a cluster are not topologically separated, they either topologically cohere or topologically adhere.

The relation between material entities of a group is characterized by metric proximity, whereas in clusters it is characterized by topological adherence.

The material entities of a group (see also collection, [31]; related to, but not identical with Smith's use of 'group' in [32] or 'agglomeration' in [33]) are positioned topologically separately from and relative to one another within space, like for instance trees in a forest, fish in a shoal, or a heap of stones.

On a higher level of granularity, the adherence through chemical bonds or physical junctions between material entities of finer granularity is treated as coherence (Fig. 5): a given material entity may be treated as an aggregate of two cells that adhere to one another at the finer cellular level of granularity, and at the same time as a fiat body part at the coarser multicellular-organism level.

We have shown that, under the premise of a constitutive granularity of material entities, the current top-level categories of material entity of BFO are insufficient for developing domain ontologies that are consistent with the single inheritance policy.

As a consequence, we can distinguish two subtypes for each basic type of material entity aggregate: groups of material entities and clusters of material entities (Fig. 6).

This possible constellation holds for any aggregate of material entities: every aggregate of material entities can possess immaterial parts (i.e. negative objects: certain types of holes, e.g., tunnels, caves, tubes and hollows), which are continuously connected to the space surrounding the aggregate.

Thus, it is clear that such systems are not only composed of material entities; at least some of the constituents of experimental systems are conceptual in nature.

All possible combinations of these five building blocks result in 31 (i.e. five different types of group-building blocks, each of which can be absent or present in the group, results in 52 possible combinations minus the combination of the absence of all building blocks: 52−1 = 31) basic types of groups of material entity (some of which are depicted in Fig. 6).

Assuming a constitutive granularity of material entities, with bona fide objects of coarser granularity being composed out of bona fide objects of finer granularity (e.g. cells out of molecules) (see Partitioning, Basic Formal Ontology, and Constitutive Granularity), rises another problem.