Sentence examples for matching of trials from inspiring English sources

The fidelity of matching of trials using surrogate outcomes and those using final patient relevant outcomes seemed to be retained in these 185 trials (table 1) and in the subgroup of trials reporting binary primary outcomes (data not shown).

Historical controls involved the comparison of outcome data with the existing published evidence or the retrospective matching of trial participants with control subjects from a registry.

We provide empirical evidence that trials using surrogate primary outcomes report larger treatment effects than a matched sample of trials using final patient relevant primary outcomes.

36 37 Thirdly, we estimated log odds ratios and associated standard errors for each matched pair of trials, using the method of Bucher et al, 38 and combined across trials using random effects meta-analysis.

An alternative approach would be to estimate the buildup rate using identical time intervals in both regimes, but Monte Carlo simulations revealed that it would result in a larger underestimation in the high speed regime than using an approach that based the endpoint on a matched level of trial attrition (results not shown).

The final category of matching trials consisted of cue-balancing trials and had the same cue as the non-matching crucial conditions.

Within each subject, we matched the number of trials in these two classes and also selected equal numbers of seen correct and unseen correct trials.

The memory probe digit was a match on 50% of trials selected at random.

The advantage of this approach is that we were able to match the number of trials for all possible variables (e.g., left vs. right hand/visual field, etc).

Unlike the non-matching stimuli, on matching trials, one of the digits in the cue matched the probe (see Table A.1).

A total of 43 pairs of matched trials were available for a paired analysis, with a pooled ratio of odds ratios of 1.38 (1.01 to 1.88, P=0.04).