Sentence examples for matching methods do from inspiring English sources

Sparse stereo matching methods do not calculate disparity at every pixel and are deployed for their low complexity or if only sparse data is needed.

Matching methods do not require this knowledge, but there is a trade-off; matching does not work well when important unobservable differences between those with and without the disease exist, as is true for T2D [15].

In principle the point-matching method does not suffer from any severe restrictions upon the cross-sectional shape of the silencer even though the rate of convergence is strongly related to the geometry.

The empirical example provided promising evidence that interval matching reduced more selection bias than did commonly used matching methods including the rival method, caliper matching.

Because these beneficial properties of interval matching, the empirical example demonstrated that interval matching is not only a viable alternative to caliper matching, but also produced promisingly more balanced data than did all other matching methods including caliper matching.

Accounting for the initial severity of stroke using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale as well as using propensity score matching method as a sensitivity analysis, did not modify the results.Among older IS patients diabetes was associated with increased risks of death, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular hospitalizations, HF, and IS/TIA recurrence.

The trends with vane count predicted by the two methods do not match and it is unclear which prediction is correct.

It has been observed that the detection of almost insignificant objects by all three methods do not match.

As the grain size from SEM images is the domains formed by the agglomeration of nanocrystalline [41], the grain sizes from the SEM images and the crystalline size calculated from the debye scherrer's and Williamson–Hall methods do not match as the grains seen in the SEM are the domains formed by aggregation of crystallites [41].

The 9-mers form only the core of the binding peptide, the variability in alleles is much wider than in class I alleles, and the available prediction methods do not match the prediction capabilities of MHC class I predictors [69].

If the methods do not match this may explain why you see differences.