Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
To achieve age matching between groups, structural scans (T0) of 36 patients (54.2 ± 8.6 years) were selected from the available 60 scans for the VBM comparison with structural data of all 36 controls (P = 0.652).
While this reduces the matching between groups, statistical significance was not observed over the insulin treatment group.
However, this group of patients is a highly selected group without significant comorbidity and the data were comparable regarding basic characteristics, suggesting an acceptable matching between groups.
In clinical studies, genetic and environmental differences in the population underpin the need for patient randomization or, at the very least, careful matching between groups.
Furthermore, the nature of the risk factors of CV disease (i.e., diet, alcohol and cigarette usage, sedentarism, obesity) further complicates these studies making patient matching between groups very difficult.
Similar(55)
Confounding variables were matched between groups (see Table 1, also see Du et al., 2011 51.
Animals recovered at least three days before scanning (mean 4.0; range 3 5 days; matched between groups: p > 0.5).
In participants not receiving two indentations at 60 N, 59 N or 61 N was used; this was matched between groups.
If participants did not receive two indentations at 60 N, either two indentations at 59 N or 61 N were used (i.e., 60 N ± 1 N); this was matched between groups.
Baseline characteristics were evenly matched between groups.
All participants' characteristics and baseline measurements matched between groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com