Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Word picture matching accuracy was significantly predicted by picture picture matching accuracy (W = 12.229, P < 0.001).
We performed a 2 Morphological Complexity (morphologically complex vs. single-morpheme matched control words) × 2 Task Type (oral reading passage vs. naming task) repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) to investigate accuracy levels within participants.
Matching accuracy and mismatch rate are manually determined for each match, namely describing matching performance with accuracy and error.
These experiments achieved a 95% matching accuracy.
The goal of this study is to improve matching accuracy.
This probability is referred to as matching accuracy.
Accuracy levels were calculated using accuracy rates.
Within 10percentt accuracy levels such errors are acceptable.
As can be seen from the table, the results match perfectly well for the set accuracy level.
In the other words, it should be ensured that the achievable accuracy level of this technology matches up to the desired accuracy level for a particular application.
Fix accuracy level (varepsilon>0).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com