Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
In total, 34 protein matches were categorized as cell adhesion and coagulation orthologues.
The genes not having matches were categorized as male-specific.
Reads without SNP positions or matches were categorized as unknown (N).
Once all matches were categorized, a GFF file was created allowing these to be viewed along side the current annotations in a genome browser for manual evaluation if necessary.
Reasons for nonexact matches were categorized as the addition or omission of one or more bands in one pattern compared with the other, mismatch of individual bands in compared patterns, and a shift up or down in one pattern compared with the other.
Based on the results from BlastX and InterProScan searches, ESTs with significant matches were categorized according to their putative functions (Table 1, for detail [see Additional file 4]). a The original EST number and best hit were listed in Additional file 4 [see Additional file 4].
Similar(54)
According to the ratio of dN:dS, all matched genes were categorized into three groups, highly conserved (< 0.035), normal, and positive selection (> 1).
Transcripts matching coral genes more closely than Symbiodinium genes that also matched metazoan records or lacked matches in nr were categorized as metazoan.
Reads with matches to both were categorized as chimeric (X).
Reads with at least 75% (a user-specified parameter) of matches for one genome were categorized as AT or DT, accordingly.
For successful trials (the show was correctly programmed), steps that the model would make were categorized as matches to the model; steps that the model would not make were violations of the model.
More suggestions(15)
couples were categorized
matches were recognized
matches were evaluated
stages were categorized
matches were summarized
matches were calculated
matches were postponed
matches were organised
matches were scheduled
matches were fought
matches were suspended
matches were rained
matches were proposed
matches were played
matches were fixed
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com