Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
A mix of urban, regional and rural general practices across Queensland, Australia are participating in this study, with control practices matched to intervention practices by geographic location, size, patient profile, and shared hospital referral pathways.
Of the interested screening survey respondents, 195 individuals were matched to intervention group participants based on their screening survey data.
Four comparison sites were matched to intervention sites on ZDF branch, urban/rural status, and – as closely as possible – service volume and size of catchment population.
Control practices were matched to intervention practices based on the presence of primary care professionals within general practices to ensure comparability at baseline.
Within these provinces, eight districts were randomly assigned into a future intervention group, while seven districts were assigned to a non-intervention group and matched to intervention sites on poverty and registration rates.
Similar(55)
To enhance similarity between the intervention and control groups, controls were matched to the intervention group for age, gender, and functional status as measured by MBI. 19, 20 Stroke patients with MBI scores greater than 70 were excluded from the control group unless an intervention participant with a similarly high score was included.
The equation above denotes that all control units with estimated propensity scores, p j, fall within a radius r from the intervention unit i's propensity score, p i, are matched to the intervention unit i.
Across treatment, experience sampling procedures will be matched to the intervention group.
We selected six intervention facilities that met the criteria and an additional six control facilities that were matched to each intervention facility based on geographical location, number of patients on ART, and level of care.
From day 22, all study procedures will be matched to the intervention group.
In addition, control participants were matched to the intervention group for age, sex, and functional status as far as possible.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com