Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
As a consequence these data were log-transformed and then a matched rate ratio was generated for each measure (acute and chronic) of hospitalisation and death.
This matched rate ratio was the log-transformed rate of the alcohol SMR divided by the control SMR for each LGA.
After weighting by the total number of cases in each LGA, the matched rate ratios of acute and chronic alcohol-attributable hospitalisation and chronic alcohol-attributable death were associated with the squared centred Gini coefficients of LGAs.
The main outcome measures used were matched rate ratios for four measures of alcohol caused harm; acute (primarily related to the short term consequences of drinking) and chronic (primarily related to the long term consequences of drinking) alcohol-attributable hospitalisation and acute and chronic alcohol-attributable death.
The matched rate ratios for all four alcohol-attributable outcomes (acute and chronic alcohol-attributable hospitalisations, acute and chronic alcohol-attributable deaths) described above were entered into a linear regression as outcome variables with LGA-level Gini coefficient, SEIFA disadvantage scores (included as decile values) and ARIA category (five levels) entered as predictor variables.
Alternatively, matched rate reaction mixtures were prepared under identical conditions except enzyme concentrations were 8.4, 167, and 334 nM for UPPS from B. fragilis, E. coli, and V. vulnificus, respectively, with 2CNA-GPP 6 and 0.042, 1.0, and 1.7 μM, respectively, with 2AA-GPP 5. Reactions were quenched with 50 μL of 2-propanol for HPLC analysis.
Similar(54)
Thereafter, we suggest rates of incision matched rates of uplift.
The statement level matching rate was 49% (22/45).
Overall, we see only a small difference in matching rates when we consider category matches as opposed to exact matches, with category matching rates approximately 1% higher than exact matching rates (Table 2).
The pulse rate matched the heart rate.
There are two key measures of how good a biometric system is: the false match rate, and the false non-match rate.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com