Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(3)
In these experiments participants had to decide between real words and made-up combinations of first and second characters matched on frequency and complexity.
Adults' accuracy and response times were measured on different types of morphologically complex words and compared with control words matched on frequency in both the passage and the naming tasks.
Words on both lists were matched on frequency and typicality of category membership using frequency and association norms from the Dutch language (Baayen et al. 1993; Ruts et al. 2004). 2 In the present study, the procedure for learning the two word lists was as follows.
Similar(57)
Briefly, 40 drug words matched on length, frequency in the English language, and part of speech (noun, adjective, adverb, verb) with 40 household-related (neutral) items were used (Fig. 1); non-English words or slang words that may have not been recognized by the control subjects were not included.
The opaque and transparent stimulus groups were matched on their frequency of occurrence per million words using the CELEX database (Baayen, Piepenbrock, & Gulikers, 1995).
Two sets of 36 word pairs were constructed, with the members of each pair being matched on word frequency and number of letters, but differing in emotional tone.
To determine the likelihood that SNPs associated with autoimmune or inflammatory phenotypes were located in elements responsible for splice site choice by chance alone, we selected 1000 sets of 338 random SNPs matched on allele frequency (± 5%) and gene proximity (± 10 kb).
Controls were matched on ethnicity and frequency matched on 5-year age bands.
We identified 2,093 case SNPs and, for each, identified one control SNP matched on chromosome, minor allele frequency and the genotyping platform(s) it appeared on.
All words were matched based on frequency with the corresponding word types in the oral reading passage.
For inflected endings, the naming task included three – s words, three –ed words, and three –ing words, each of which was matched based on frequency with single-morpheme control words utilizing the SFI (Appendix B).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com