Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
At one year after the start of treatment, the matched groups were compared on change in functioning (GAF-M), five psychosis-risk dimensions of the Structured Interview for Psychosis-Risk Syndromes (SIPS), and self-reported anxiety, depression, and hopelessness symptoms (BAI, BDI-II, BHS).
Five matched groups were created based on quintiles of the score.
Based on the calculated propensity scores, two evenly matched groups were formed for surgical technique using a matching algorithm with the common caliper set at 0.010.
We confirmed that the matched groups were balanced by ensuring that the standardized differences between groups for each covariate were less than 10.
Thus, 208 matched groups were included in the analyses, varying from two to twelve patients, of which 1 to 4 were CNCM patients.
These matched groups were followed from the start of a 3-year analysis period beginning on 1 September 2003 and ending on 31 August 2006.
Similar(50)
In general, it is correct that matched groups are dependent per definition.
Major clinical characteristics of the age, gender and postmenopausal status matched groups are presented in Table 1.
The failure to find evidence for illusory recovery in the form of differences between the recovered and matched groups was counter to expectations and merits careful evaluation.
The matched group was also younger than the unmatched group: for example, 94% (n=960) of the matched group were aged under 50 years compared with 87% (n=203) of the unmatched group.
In the matching procedure, 212 matching groups were identified.
More suggestions(15)
matched groups described
matched groups well
compatible groups were
matched recruits were
matched participants were
matched peptides were
matched data were
matched sets were
matched images were
matched parameters were
matched sRNAs were
matched groups appeared
matched mice were
matched communities were
matched sequences were
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com