Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The two matched groups appeared very similar (Table 1).
Similar(59)
While the initial (Session 1) object recognition scores (D1, D2) of the two groups appeared closely matched, they looked very different by Session 13.
While the treatment and placebo groups appeared to be well matched and blinding appeared to be adequate in this study, we cannot be certain that the groups were well matched for baseline performance at the 400-m run.
The route of feeding was not randomised, but, despite this, the groups appeared to be well matched according to most parameters, including illness severity.
This is an evenly matched group.
According to the initial analysis of the data, differences between the two groups appeared, and therefore, after post stratification, frequency matching was applied [ 66].
Sex-matching of sample groups appears to be unnecessary in studies focusing either on pre-weaned mice or on parameters such as QRS and QTc, which never display a difference between males and females.
In the matching procedure, 212 matching groups were identified.
The two groups appear very closely matched when comparing all measures of illness severity.
The two groups appear to be well matched in terms of sociodemographic characteristics and in history of mental health problems in self and family.
(Different student groups appear in each show).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com