Exact(2)
All treatment groups were well matched for general characteristics.
After screening the male and female population for specific filters, homogenous subpopulations were formed matched for general metabolic features in both sexes (i.e. subpopulations did not differ in age, BMI, body fat percent, AC and HbA1c), when comparing subjects genetically disposed and not disposed to diabetes (GD vs. GND groups).
Similar(58)
The HC, MCI and AD patients from both age groups were matched for gender and general cognitive status (MMSE).
Participants Men and women aged 40 years or over 2954 with oesophageal cancer, 2018 with gastric cancer, and 10 641 with colorectal cancer, diagnosed in 1995-2005; five controls per case matched for age, sex, general practice, and observation time.
The two groups were well matched for age, education, income, general health, number of cigarettes smoked per day, and number of previous attempts to quit.
The groups were matched for age, gender, and general cognitive ability [measured using mini-mental state examination (MMSE)].
Given the extent of missing data, in the analysis of all patients, we were able to adjust only for baseline smoking status, having previously matched for age, sex, and general practice.
In this study, as all non-carriers are relatives of mutation carriers and, therefore, in general matched for familial factors that may be risk factors for CRC, the two groups are comparable.
Each identified case (346 551) was matched for age, sex and general practice with 5 randomly selected control cases (1 732 755) with no diagnosis of SMI in each yearly time point.
When compared with women in the general population matched for age and calendar year, the survival of these older women did not differ significantly from survival of women in the general population.
Comparing musicians and non-musiciansIn the first study, researchers took 28 adults, divided into musicians and non-musicians, who were matched for age, gender, intelligence and general language ability.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com