Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(42)
We investigated accuracy and response times on inflected morphologically complex words compared to single-morpheme matched control words.
We were also interested in printed word identification accuracy on types of derived morphologically complex words versus matched control words presented in context and in isolation.
There was a significant interaction between morphological complexity and task type for low-frequency versus high-frequency base matched control words, F (1, 51) = 37.76, p <.001.
The only word type that did not follow this trend was the high-frequency complex words versus pseudocomplex matched control words.
A difference in accuracy and response times between morphologically complex words and matched control words would indicate sensitivity to morphological complexity.
Next, we looked at the morphological characteristics of word frequency and word transparency in derived morphologically complex words compared to matched control words.
Similar(18)
We hypothesized that participants would demonstrate greater accuracy and respond faster to all three of the derived matched control word types as compared to the three types of derived complex word types in both the oral reading passage and the naming task.
Hyönä and Olson [ 23] examined eye fixation patterns of 21 dyslexic and 21 younger, reading-age matched control children during reading of HF and LF words.
According to Epstein's unpublished research, negatively worded posts attracted more than 15 times as many clicks from undecided voters as neutrally worded ones in matched control questions.
Next, we generated a "document" for each compound-assay-dose-time treatment condition, which contained "words" differentially expressed when compared with the matched control.
The aim of the present study was to investigate cortical processing of HF, LF, and PS words in a representative dyslexic sample and a matched control group.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com