Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
The overall survival of MetS patients resembled that of the matched background population (relative survival 0.998, NS).
However, during the same period the relative survival of DM-/MetS+ patients resembled that of the matched background population (relative survival, 0.998; 95% CI, 0.978 to 1.018; NS).
Although the intensified intervention involving multiple risk factors cut this event rate by half, it is still more than three times as high as in the matched background population, leaving muchroom for improvements.
During the first 10 postoperative years, the relative survival of DM-/MetS+ patients was 1.8% better than that of the matched background population (relative survival, 1.018; 95% CI, 1.010 to 1.026; p < 0.0001) but subsequently deteriorated thereafter.
However, the mortality of MetS patients was not significantly inferior to that of the matched background population, which might reflect the careful postoperative follow-up and treatment of known risk factors of operated MetS patients.
In this long-term follow-up study patients with neither DM nor MetS had extremely good prognosis for at least 16 years when compared to the matched background population.
Similar(54)
In this long-term follow-up study patient groups without diabetes had at least equal 16 years' survival after CABG than their matched background populations.
To the best of our knowledge this study is the first in which the survival of non-diabetic and diabetic CABG patients was compared to that of matched background populations.
Our principal finding was that the long-term prognosis of patients with neither diabetes nor metabolic syndrome was better than that of the age-, sex-and time-matched background population.
Our principal finding was that after postoperative period the 16-year prognosis of patients with neither DM nor MetS was better than that of the age-, sex-and time-matched background population (relative survival against background population 1.037, p < 0.0001).
The project will provide information regarding differences in psychiatric morbidity over decades and causes of deaths among women and men in ART treatment compared with an age-matched background population with no history of ART.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com