Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
This paper presents a review of existing methods to estimate the rock mass strength using empirical failure criteria and classification/characterisation systems in this study, commonly denoted as estimation methods.
Similar(59)
Rock mass strength was estimated using the generalized Hoek-Brown failure criterion.
Based on the classification and Uniaxial Compressive Strength test results, rock mass strength was defined using generalised Hoek-Brown's failure criteria.
The effect of rock bolts on rock mass strength was also evaluated by using a discrete element method model which suggested that rock bolts can significantly increases residual strength but have limited effect on increasing the peak strength of rock masses.
However, as the stress-induced risks increase, i.e., the stress magnitudes approach the rock mass strength, the confidence in commonly used stress measurement techniques decrease.
The rock mass strengths were also determined using the integration of Rock Mass Rating (RMR) and Hoek Brown failure criterion.
So the M-MC strength criterion well reveals the rock mass bearing behavior and can be widely used in the rock mass strength analysis.
But Dr. Miller, the Harvard physician, points out that beta blockers differ significantly from steroids, which use testosterone to increase muscle mass, strength and speed.
In addition to bone mass, strength of the femoral neck will be estimated from the DXA-measurements using the AHA-software.
This study has also clearly shown the limits of presently available strength estimation methods for rock masses and further work is required to develop more precise, practical, and easy-to-use methods for determining the rock mass strength.
The results suggest that future prospective longitudinal studies employing objective methods for measuring muscle mass and function are needed to elucidate the relationship between statin use and temporal changes in muscle mass, strength, and functional ability.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com