Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(3)
The £10 note features HMS Beagle, the vessel on which Darwin collected a mass of specimens and notes from which he drew his most significant conclusions.
The procedure of the experiment was as follows; first, the mass of specimens was measured precisely to 0.0001 digits by using a high sensitive electronic balance, and then the specimens were immersed into 100 ml of 1 M Hydrochloric acid solution in absence and presence of various concentrations of Tilia cordata extract at 30 °C.
Darwin published An Appreciation of the book in the Natural History Review in 1863, in which he notes that Bates sent back "a mass of specimens" of "no less than 14,712 species" (mostly of insects), of which 8000 were new to science.
Similar(57)
The density of each specimen was then computed as: Density = Mass of specimen Volume of specimen.
The average cumulative water mass of specimen generally increases with an increase of crack width for the ranges studied.
Durability was evaluated by the changes in compressive strength and mass of mortar specimens after 28 cycles of alternate wetting at 23 °C and drying at 110 °C.
The average changes in the mass of concrete specimens representing the changes in the bulk density and eventually changes in porosity are presented in Table 3.
Comparable published data on hind limb muscle mass in extant vertebrates is scarce, and many studies omit the total body mass of the specimens making it impossible for the ratio to be determined.
A Welch Two-Sample t-test was used to compare the two rat groups, showing that the mass of these specimens is significantly different by strain (p < 0.001).
The mass of each specimen was measured before and after dehydration.
It is shown that the mass of the specimen increases as the pressure increases but, upon decompression under the conditions described, it is quite constant until 15 MPa and then it falls rapidly.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com