Exact(6)
Ivuna and Orgueil show a mass loss event at 200 300 °C, comparable to the dehydroxylation temperature of ferrihydrite.
In absence of a catalyst, myristic acid presented a single mass loss event with an activation energy value of ∼87 90 kJ mol−1.
In this scenario the CE-phase operates virtually as a instantaneous mass loss event, and therefore the maximum orbital separation for the outer orbit to remain bound is strongly dependent on the uncertain timescale of the CE-event (Section 2.2.1).
The IOM is refractory but has a complex and heterogeneous composition that probably causes it to decompose over a broad temperature range rather than as a single mass loss event (Court and Sephton 2014).
Moreover, the system is followed for multiple Myrs after the mass loss event in both papers, such that the inclination rises above 90∘, and the inner and outer orbit become retrograde to each other.
The CI-like meteorites then suffer a mass loss event at just above 700 °C, which is larger for Y-980115, but still significantly lower than that seen at the same temperature in Ivuna and Orgueil.
Similar(54)
The apparent activation energy of the second mass loss events was always higher than that of the first mass loss events.
In the case of myristic acid adsorbed on SiO2,γ-Al2O3, SiO2-Al2O3 and HZSM-5 at least two different mass loss events occurred during linear heating, associated to myristic acid volatilization/decomposition.
The CI-like chondrites Y-82162 and Y-980115 on the other hand show no major mass loss events (except a small peak at ~400 °C) until ~700 °C, suggesting that the phyllosilicates had already been dehydrated to this temperature prior to analysis.
AFM was used to resolve initial particle swelling and mass loss events.
As known today, various types of horizontal transfers were the key force to drive the evolution of prokaryotes [ 1– 3], while duplications of genes, partial or entire genomes, and mass gene loss events formed the genotypes of many higher eukaryotes, including higher plants [ 4– 6] and vertebrates [ 7– 10].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com