Suggestions(5)
Exact(5)
mass error of each single spectrum 2000; desired mass error for the MSP 200; desired peak frequency 25%%; max.
When the above techniques are applied simultaneously, the results give rise to sub-30 ppb rms mass error for 5250 assigned peaks in a petroleum FT-ICR mass spectrum.
This includes mass error for all precursor ions and matched peptides, protein Mowse scores, as well as peptides with PTMs and a search option to extract all PTMs (with peptides and accessions).
Comparing the initial nine m/ z values to their calculated values in Table 2, the average mass error for these N-glycans was 38.7 ppm (from calculated sodiated masses).
The mean mass error for annotated mass spectral features was 2.4 ppm (σ = 2.1 ppm, median = 2.5 ppm); the mean percent error for isotopomer abundances (including, first, second, and third isotopomer abundance errors) was 2.9% (σ = 2.9%, median = 1.7%).
Similar(55)
The software performs automatic recalibration such that typical mass errors for MS and MS/MS data were below 10 ppm.
Despite the fact that this low abundance variant represents only 0.70%% of total peak area (see Fig. 3a), all diagnostic fragment ions as well as the intact mass of the protein were detected, albeit with higher mass errors for the low intensity fragments.
Other parameters used in data analysis were: four allowed missing cleavages; mass error of 10 ppm for precursor ions and 0.5 Da for fragment ions.
The GNF-351 glucuronides (G1 and G2) were eluted at 4.86 and 4.12 min, respectively, and yielded a match for C30H33N7O6 with the mass error of 3.2 and −7.0 for G1 and G2.
MS data were searched with mass tolerance of 5 ppm and a maximum mass error of 0.5 µ for MS/MS data.
As for LC-MS/MS data a mass error of 0.3 Da was allowed for both the MS and MS/MS mode and variable modifications were set as for the database searches with the MALDI-MS data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com