Sentence examples for marrow stimulation procedures from inspiring English sources

Marrow stimulation procedures promote cartilage repair by stimulating bone marrow through the subchondral bone and by producing blood clots containing MSCs on the articular surface (Madry et al. 2010).

Furthermore, marrow stimulation procedures combined with high tibial osteotomy have been attempted in order to improve cartilage lesion remodeling (Matsunaga et al. 2007; Sterett and Steadman 2004).

Cartilage marrow stimulation procedures (microfracture), autografts, and allografts may be used to attempt repair of isolated cartilage defects of the tibial plafond or the talus, and block allografts may be used to replace a larger portion of talus [5, 23].

Among the currently available surgical approaches, bone marrow stimulation procedures aim at favoring the healing process in the lesion site, taking advantage of the migration of stem cells from the subchondral bone with minimal invasiveness and limited costs, even though paired with well-known limitations (Orth et al. [2012]; Kon et al. [2011b]).

To halt the progress of cartilage deterioration as the result of focal cartilage damage, several conventional treatments have been suggested, including marrow stimulation procedures [ 6].

The arthroscopic marrow stimulation procedure for these arthritic lesions was performed in a standardized manner by a single surgeon (Y.S.K).

Therefore, a marrow stimulation procedure for arthritic lesions in the medial aspect of the ankle joint may improve the overall outcomes of SMO in varus ankle osteoarthritis.

Kim et al. (Kim et al. 2014b) found a significant correlation between cartilage regeneration and the clinical outcomes of SMO in patients with varus ankle osteoarthritis and reported that the arthroscopic marrow stimulation procedure improves cartilage regeneration after SMO.

The degree of surgical invasion is as minimal as the marrow stimulation techniques, since our procedure can also be performed arthroscopically.

While progenitor cells can be made accessible within sites of injury by procedures like marrow stimulation (Dewan et al. 2014; Madry et al. 2011), the outcomes of such techniques do not match the expected native hyaline cartilage and instead, a fibrocartilaginous repair tissue is formed in the lesions with mostly type-I versus type-II collagen and proteoglycans (Dewan et al. 2014).

Although cartilage regenerative procedures such as marrow stimulation are not traditional treatment measures for osteoarthritis, they are gaining increasing interest because of their potential to provide pain relief and alter osteoarthritis progression (Lyu et al. 2012; Zhu et al. 2013).